Participant surveys
Short, structured interviews by phone or in person, designed for comparability across programmes and over time.

Our Approach
Human, Nature and Future — and a five-step path from listening to action.
The idea
Our approach is modelled on lean, listening-led impact measurement: ask the people a programme serves, in a way that is fast, respectful and comparable, then put what they say at the centre of decisions. We read every finding through three lenses.

Lens 1
What changed for people?
The Human lens is where most assessments begin. We ask participants directly about the change they experienced, and pair their answers with indicators that can be tracked over time.

Lens 2
What did the programme leave behind in the environment?
Many programmes touch land, water and climate even when that is not their goal. The Nature lens makes those effects visible — positive or negative — so they can be managed.

Lens 3
Will the gains last?
The Future lens asks whether change will outlive the project: whether people, institutions and systems are better prepared for what comes next.
Methodology
A disciplined path — the marg that gives us our name. Each step has a clear output, so you always know where the work stands.
We begin with your goals, your theory of change and the questions you need answered — then speak with the people closest to the change before fixing a single indicator.
Outputs: Scoping call · stakeholder conversations · question list
Short, well-tested instruments in local languages, a sampling plan that fits the budget, and a clear plan for consent, privacy and data ownership.
Outputs: Assessment design · survey instruments · sampling plan · ethics plan
Trained local enumerators collect data by phone, in person or through hybrid paper-and-digital methods, with informed consent and quality checks every day.
Outputs: Field or phone data collection · daily quality monitoring
Human-led, AI-assisted analysis: what changed, for whom and how much. Limitations are written down, and unwelcome findings are reported as clearly as good ones.
Outputs: Cleaned dataset · analysis · draft findings
A report and debrief built around decisions: what to keep, what to fix, and what to measure next time. Dashboards and scorecards where they help.
Outputs: Final report · debrief workshop · recommendations
Methods toolkit
Short, structured interviews by phone or in person, designed for comparability across programmes and over time.
In-depth interviews and focus groups that explain the “why” behind the numbers.
Baseline and follow-up measurement, with comparison groups where they are feasible and ethical.
Making careful use of the records a programme already keeps, after checking their quality.
Working backwards from observed changes to understand what contributed to them.
Faster analysis of open-ended responses, always reviewed and interpreted by people.
Principles
Every participant knows why we are asking, how answers will be used, and that they can stop at any time.
Findings are reported as they are. Our fee never depends on the result.
Sampling, assumptions and limitations are written into every report.
Clear agreements on who owns the data, who can see it and when it is deleted.
Book a free scoping consultation. We will listen first, then propose an assessment that fits your programme, timeline and budget.